Tuesday, December 31, 2013

The Best Supporting Actors of 2013

10 - Ben Foster (Ain't Them Bodies Saints)



9 - Andrew Dice Clay (Blue Jasmine)



8 - Jim Carrey (The Incredible Burt Wonderstone)


7 - Daniil Vorobyov (Eastern Boys)



6 - Dwayne Johnson (Pain & Gain)



5 - Rob Lowe (Behind the Candelabra)



4 - Shaun Thomas (The Selfish Giant)



3 - Jonah Hill (The Wolf of Wall Street)



2 - Patrick d'Assumçao (Stranger by the Lake)



1 - Barkhad Abdi (Captain Phillips)



My Cinema Discoveries of 2013

10 – Kalpana


The 1948 film Kalpana was conceived and directed by Uday Shankar, the brother of the legendary musician Ravi Shankar, and it proved to be the only film he would ever make. Uday was already a renowned choreographer in India before he embarked on this project, spending four years in production on a film that expressed itself through all forms of Indian dance.  He cast himself as choreographer determined to establish a theatre that celebrates Indian culture and heritage while getting embroiled in an ongoing love triangle, with this central narrative being the springboard for a series of remarkable fantasy dance sequences. Shankar also finds room in Kalpana's 155 minutes for plenty of comedy, some political commentary on the future of India and even a satire on the movie business, which the director attempted to circumnavigate by financing this passion project himself. Kalpana took Uday Shankar the best part of five years to make, and perhaps the reason he never stepped behind a camera again is simply that he plunged every single filmmaking idea and instinct into this extraordinary feast of a film. Kalpana is a true one-off, and a wonderful rediscovery by Martin Scorsese's World Cinema Foundation.

9 – Anand Patwardhan





I had never heard of Anand Patwardhan before the BFI programmed a number of his films across a single weekend in February, but after viewing his work it was clear that I had encountered a vital filmmaker whose work deserves much wider exposure. Patwardhan's documentaries explore social issues in India from a number of different perspectives. War and Peace examined the cost of the nuclear arms race; Father, Son & Holy War explored Indian attitudes towards masculine identity; In the Name of God looked at the rise of Hindu fundamentalism. The director's latest film Jai Bhim Comrade – 14 years in the making – is a masterpiece that begins with the twin tragedies of the 1997 massacre of Dalit protestors and the subsequent suicide of the poet Vilas Ghogre, before expanding to explore the issue of caste discrimination in Indian society. Patwardhan's films unfold at a measured pace, with points being clearly argued and discussed, and with Indian music and poetry being a constant presence. I found his work to be hugely intelligent, compelling and illuminating, and I felt very fortunate to have the opportunity to meet him this year to discuss it.

8 – Love Me Tonight


There had been a number of fine musical comedies before Love Me Tonight was made in 1932 – indeed, this film's star Maurice Chevalier made a number with Lubitsch – but there's a sense of freedom, fluidity and invention about Rouben Mamoulian's wonderful film that means it still feels fresh and daring today. It opens with a marvellous sequence in which the ordinary sounds of a Parisian morning are combined into a symphony, and that sense of invention and technical mastery is evident through. Look at the way Mamoulian links his two stars: Chevalier's humble tailor starts singing Isn't it Romantic and sets an infectious tune that is then carried on by various passers-by until it reaches the ear of the princess (Jeanette MacDonald), with whom he will soon meet and fall in love. Later, after his identity is uncovered, the song The Son of  Gun is Nothing but a Tailor hops wittily between characters and locations. These sequences epitomise the way Love Me Tonight flows beautifully, with both Mamoulian and his cast displaying expert comic timing and a gloriously unfettered imagination.

7 – Fellini-Satyricon



Until this year, I had seen none of Federico Fellini's work beyond his great 1963 film . I had heard mixed reports on the quality of his later films, but the rare 35mm screening of Fellini-Satyricon that A Nos Amours hosted this year was a wonderful surprise. This adaptation of the writings of Petronius gave Fellini the scope to be as decadent, undisciplined and visually delirious as he wished. There's a loose plot of sorts but the film is essentially a thinly connected series of episodes set in Nero's Rome, with Fellini clearly being enraptured by the indulgence, hedonism and violence of this society, while the walls of the empire crumble around them. Satyricon is a rich, hallucinatory vision of Ancient Rome, re-imagined by a distinctive artist. It has certainly inflamed by desire to seek out the rest of Fellini's post- work.

6 - The Mother and the Whore



Jean Eustache’s The Mother and the Whore was a film that I had wanted to see for many years, and when I finally caught a rare screening in London this year it didn’t disappoint. The film is a loose, discursive study of three young Parisians (played by Jean-Pierre Léaud, Bernadette Lafont and engaged in an unusual ménage à trois, with Léaud’s Alexandre being a pretentious, self-absorbed fop who would rather talk about love, sex and politics than engage in them in any meaningful way.  In fact, the film is all talk, with much of its 3½-hour running time consisting of long takes in which the characters endlessly talk, but in the hands of Eustache and his flawless cast it is riveting, illuminating and frequently hilarious to watch. This was Eustache’s first feature but it is the work of a man in complete command of his material, and one can only admire the brash confidence he must have possessed to make this epic, verbose film his debut. The Mother and the Whore is a wry, intelligent examination of male-female relationships that still feels bracing and insightful today.

5 - The Tarnished Angels


The Tarnished Angels joined the Masters of Cinema collection this year, making it the first Douglas Sirk film to be released on blu-ray (long overdue!), but my first encounter with the film came on the big screen. I was thrilled to see it presented on a gorgeous 35mm printed that showcased the film’s gorgeous black-and-white ‘Scope cinematography. This adaptation of William Faulkner’s Pylon was one of Sirk’s most cherished projects and he later described it as his best film, an assessment I’d be inclined to agree with. The Tarnished Angels reunites Rock Hudson, Dorothy Malone and Robert Stack, the stars of the previous year’s Written on the Wind, in a dark and complex melodrama set against the backdrop of aviation shows, in which pilots risks their lives to make a living in Depression-era America. The aerial sequences are spectacularly filmed, and the characters’ troubled psychological states are expressed through Irving Glassberg’s stunning use of shadows.    

4 - Berlin Alexanderplatz


I still feel like I have only scratched the surface of Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s vast body of work, but I experienced a huge chunk of it this year with his 15½-hour television series Berlin Alexanderplatz, which screened over a single weekend at the ICA. Although it was made for TV, Berlin Alexanderplatz is a film that definitely deserves the big screen treatment, with the director’s wonderfully fluid camerawork and imaginative exploitation of confined spaces making this a genuinely cinematic work. At a time when we think of our contemporary television programmes as groundbreaking works of art, it’s sobering to watch Berlin Alexanderplatz and see what a genuine film artist can do with the form. Berlin Alexanderplatz consists of 13 episodes in which Fassbinder’s restrained, classical approach is perfectly suited to Döblin’s narrative, before the director’s own obsessions burst through to the surface in the surreal epilogue, which could almost stand alone as a masterpiece in itself. Berlin Alexanderplatz is a monumental achievement.

3 - Chantal Akerman


Adam Roberts and Joanna Hogg’s A Nos Amours collective has had another wonderful year, hosting screenings of Tarkovsky’s Solaris, Fred Kelemen's Frost and Mohsen Makhmalbaf's A Moment of Innocence among others. But their most exciting project is an ongoing retrospective of Chantal Akerman’s films, with all of her work being screened over the course of 18 months. Akerman is a brilliant choice for a retrospective like this because while she has one widely seen and acknowledged masterpiece to her name, the rest of her work remains largely unknown, and this is a fantastic way to discover a filmmaker. What has surprised me so far is how playful and experimental her early work was, as if Akerman was trying to work out exactly what type of filmmaker she was, before she suddenly produced Jeanne Dielman at the age of 25 – an astonishingly rigorous and specific masterpiece. I can’t wait to see how her career develops from that point throughout 2014.

2 - Satyajit Ray


One of my goals this year was to increase my knowledge of Indian cinema, and you can’t talk about Indian cinema without talking about Satyajit Ray, whose career was celebrated in a two-month BFI retrospective. I had already seen his Apu trilogy and Mahanagar before this year, but everything else was new to me and it was an incredible experience to discover a true master of cinema in such a way. I fell in love with Madhabi Mukherjee in Mahanagar, Charulata and The Coward, and I was in awe of Ray’s deft tonal shifts and insight in his outstanding ensemble films Days and Nights in the Forest and Kanchenjungha. But the real highlight for me was a very rare screening of his 1961 triptych Three Daughters in its entirety, a film that exhibits all of Ray’s qualities in a collection of stories that are by turn funny, unsettling and moving. It is a film that deserves to restored and re-released in its entirety.

1 - Napoleon


Well, could it really be anything else? Seeing Abel Gance’s Napoleon at the Royal Festival Hall with Carl Davis conducting his own score wasn’t just my filmgoing highlight of the year but one of the great cinematic experiences of my life. The film was made in 1927 but the range of filmmaking techniques that Gance brings to the picture make it feel almost futuristic. The handheld camerawork used in the film’s superb opening snowball fight is an extraordinary thing to see in a silent film, but Gance keeps finding striking new angles on the action; he even straps a camera to the back of a horse to plunge us right into the heart of a battle scene. His story follows Napoleon from childhood, through the French Revolution and The Terror, and up to his conquest of Italy, with every scene being staged with a vivid sense of wit, authenticity and character. The editing is breathless at times – notably in a rapid-fire montage of people singing La Marseillaise – but it reaches its zenith at the film’s legendary climax, when the screen suddenly expands to reveal Gance’s three screens side-by-side; a proto-widescreen effect that is stunningly utilised. Watching the incredible montage that closes the film while the London Philharmonic Orchestra reprised La Marseillaise was one of the most overwhelming experiences I’ve ever had in a cinema, and one I’m unlikely to experience again for a very long time.

The Worst Films of 2013

10 - Seduced and Abandoned


The general point of James Toback’s misshapen documentary Seduced and Abandoned is that artists like Toback can no longer get the funding for their films, although if the quality of this picture is anything to go by, perhaps that’s not such a bad thing. The film follows Toback and Alec Baldwin as they back-slap their way around Cannes in pursuit of funding for a Last Tango in Paris remake. Unfortunately, Toback and Baldwin prove to be two of the most obnoxious, deluded and insufferable people one could imagine being trapped in a room with. I felt particularly sorry for actresses like Diane Kruger, Jessica Chastain and Bérénice Bejo, whose eyes display a tangible panic as Toback and Baldwin discuss their plans for a “sexual political thriller.” Shambolically assembled, Seduced and Abandoned wanders from brief interview to another, without ever arriving at a cohesive argument but allowing us plenty of time to form a firm opinion of its two central figures.

9 - Identity Thief


Another mainstream Hollywood comedy that consists of stock characters, absurd situations and no regard for consistency or logic. There’s the kernel of a decent idea in Identity Thief, but director Seth Gordon continually opts for the laziest option possible. Jason Bateman is a Jason Bateman character whose chances of promotion at work are threatened (oh no!) when somebody steals his identity and runs up a huge bill on his credit cards. For some reason Bateman has to travel cross-country to accost this criminal, which is where the film turns into a chase/buddy movie and loses sight of whatever it was supposed to be about in the first place. Melissa McCarthy can be a funny woman, but here she is asked only to play it loud, which gets old fast, until she aims to earn our sympathy for the predictably trite softening at the film’s end. This is Gordon’s third witless comedy in a row and it’s disheartening to think that this is what happened to the man behind the brilliant documentary The King of Kong.

8 - I'm So Excited!




After a number of dark and emotionally charged pictures, perhaps Pedro Almodóvar’s desire to make something light and funny is understandable, but I’m So Excited! feels like a sketch idea or sitcom idea that has been painfully stretched to feature length. In fact, it most often reminded me of the old BBC2 comedy The High Life, which is hardly the standard of work we expect from a director of Almodóvar’s stature. The film’s centrepiece is a performance of The Pointer Sisters’ I’m So Excited by a trio of gay air stewards, which might not be such a bad idea in itself if they didn’t perform the whole damn song. Elsewhere, the jokes are cheap and often offensive; it’s hard to imagine that a incident involving a woman having sex with a sleeping passenger against his knowledge would have been played for laughs if the genders had been reversed. I’m So Excited! might have been a conscious attempt by Almodóvar’s to recapture the spirit of his early, bawdy films, but those early films were rarely as lifeless or tawdry as this.


7 - Adore




This extraordinarily dull tale of mothers falling in love with each other’s son might have worked if everyone involved had embraced the trashy, farcical nature of the setup, but they all take it so seriously. I guess Anne Fontaine doesn’t do levity, and I started having flashbacks to her dreadful Nathalie… as soon as I saw her name in the opening credits. She seems to be under the impression that she’s making a searing drama worthy of Bergman, and their air of solemnity that rests over the whole film is simultaneously ridiculous and stultifying. Naomi Watts and Robin Wright, both fine actresses, are left stranded by these ridiculous characters and their inexplicable motivations, while Ben Mendelsohn can feel thankful that he is written out of this one so arbitrarily halfway through before being tarnished by the stench of that Fontaine touch.

6 - The Paperboy


Lee Daniels is a full-throttle filmmaker who doesn’t let any consideration of subtlety or nuance get in the way of his pursuit of maximum impact. Some will undoubtedly enjoy the overheated, pulpy nature of The Paperboy – an adaptation of Peter Dexter’s novel – but I found it to be a dull chore, largely because Daniels is simply a very poor filmmaker. His staging and editing is a mess, creating a lumpy, ugly picture that never finds a sense of rhythm and his determination to push every button – racism, sexuality, violence – as often as possible just grows tiresome. The director demands similarly committed performances from his cast, but their heedless displays are pretty embarrassing to watch. Nicole Kidman’s deliberately trashy performance is by far the least of the picture’s crimes, but it still feels too often like an actress straining for effect, while Zac Efron just seems lost. John Cusack, meanwhile, has the rare distinction of giving two terrible performances as a sweaty weirdo in two Lee Daniels films this year, with his Richard Nixon in The Butler matching the quality of this one. Good work, John.


5 - Parkland




Made to cash in on the 50th anniversary of JFK’s assassination (it was release in UK cinemas on November 22nd), Parkland is an entirely redundant film that shifts the focus from JFK himself to a number of regular people who found themselves caught up in that day’s events. These include familiar names like Abraham Zapruder (Paul Giamatti) but also extend to lesser-known figures, such as the doctor who tried to save the President (Zac Efron) or Lee Harvey Oswald’s brother (James Badge Dale). Unfortunately, instead of a filmmaker with the Altmanesque touch required to bring this ensemble to life, Parkland is the work of former journalist and debutant director Peter Landesman. His direction has all of the energy and visual flair of a BBC Crimewatch reconstruction, and with no room to let their characters breathe, the actors never feel like anything other than actors to us. Landesman’s focus is entirely on restaging events as they happened, with no sense of how they work as drama, and the result if a film that is totally inert. In interviews to promote Parkland, Landesman has spoken of Oliver Stone’s JFK as “an interesting fairytale... but it's bullshit". That may be true, but at least Stone is a real filmmaker, and his film will still be fascinating viewers long after this cheap hackwork has been forgotten.


4 - Man of Steel




Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns is a flawed film, but it is a film that genuinely tries to create something beautiful, romantic and classical, and its ambitions largely outweighed its deficiencies for me. Certainly, I longed for Singer’s sense of restraint and composition as I suffered through the interminable climactic hour of Man of Steel, Zack Snyder’s latest exercise in overkill. A long, brutal, underwritten series of ugly visuals and huge explosions, Man of Steel is an astonishingly charmless blockbuster. The determination to make Superman as serious and brooding as Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight series means that there is no time for any lightness of touch or moments of respite, and none of the screwball romance between Clark and Lois, which is the secret of the Christopher Reeve films' continued success. It’s dull but tolerable for about half of its running time, but the action-heavy final hour is simply punishing to sit through, as a CGI Superman and General Zod destroy half a city in their stupendously tedious battle. This is a callous, empty film - forget about characterisation or humanity, just sit back and watch the fireworks.


3 - Gangster Squad





Gangster Squad was originally set to be a 2012 release before it was held back for re-editing after its cinema shootout sequence seemed inappropriate in the wake of the Aurora shooting. However, they could have done us all a favour by just holding it back indefinitely. A doomed mish-mash of conflicting tones and misjudged performances, it’s hard to know who exactly Gangster Squad is aimed at. Parts of it feel like an attempt to recreate the hard-boiled noir mood of a bygone age, while other scenes feel cartoonish, and verging on self-parody. Director Ruben Fleischer is horribly out of his depth and he has produced a gangster film that less convincing than Bugsy Malone. An interesting premise is squandered on a rote screenplay that never gives us a reason to care about the characters, while Sean Penn amuses himself with an unbearable scenery-chewing performance as Mickey Cohen, and squeaky-voiced Ryan Gosling makes little attempt to disguise his boredom.

2 - Only God Forgives



On a number of occasions in Only God Forgives a character is forced to sit and endure something against his will, which seems like a pretty apt metaphor for the experience of watching the film. Nicolas Winding Refn’s reunion with his Drive star Ryan Gosling accentuates all of the worst aspects of their first collaboration, and ditches all of its virtues. Gosling’s latest attempt at minimalism results in a performance that’s even more inert, and long scenes consist of him simply walking around Thailand in slow-motion, silently staring at things in a curious manner. At the other end of the scale, Kristin Scott Thomas camps it up tiresomely as his ghastly mother, and Vithaya Pansringarm chops people’s arms off with a sword. The film is little more than a series of bloody executions and torture scenes broken up by visually monotonous tracking shots and ludicrous conversations. I have no idea what Refn is aiming for here, but I found Only God Forgives to be nasty, juvenile, shallow garbage, and a genuine ordeal to sit through.

1 - A Good Day to Die Hard




Die Hard is one of the all-time great action films, and any sequels were always likely to suffer from diminishing returns, but who could have imagined that John McClane would hit this dismal low? A Good Day to Die Hard is the fifth film in the series and it has been thrown together by people who clearly don’t give a damn about the franchise, McClane or the audience. One of those people is Bruce Willis, whose performance in the first Die Hard film still ranks as his finest work, but A Good Day to Die Hard is Bruce at his worst – a smug, smirking brute whose line deliveries suggest a man thinking only of his bank balance. The action sequences in the film are among the worst-directed I’ve ever seen in a mainstream Hollywood action film; the long, cacophonous car chase at the start of the film is completely incoherent, while the physics-defying helicopter tussle at Chernobyl (!) adds a layer of shitty CGI into the mix. A Good Day to Die Hard is astoundingly ugly, incomprehensible (the story, such as it is, arbitrary changes direction about half-a-dozen times) and every minute of it oozes contempt for the viewer.

Die Hard 6 is already in production.

Dishonourable Mentions: 42; Dallas Buyers Club; The Do-Gooders; Fuck For Forest; Grand Piano; Hello Carter; OldBoy; Pain & Gain; Running From Crazy; Spring Breakers

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Oldboy

When the credits rolled on Spike Lee's Oldboy, I looked at my watch and was surprised to see that the film had run 15 minutes shy of two hours. This meant that it was 15 minutes shorter than the 2003 Korean film on which it is based, but it sure doesn't feel like it. Park Chan-wook's film was a ludicrous revenge story that succeeded purely because of the director's stylistic verve and the fact that he maintained an exhilarating sense of forward momentum. He gave the audience precious little downtime in which to contemplate how nonsensical it all was, as we were constantly being wrongfooted by the film's outrageous twists or bravura sequences.

This new version of Oldboy lacks both that kinetic energy and the element of surprise, and therefore it plays as a bewilderingly half-hearted exercise in reproduction, never exhibiting any understanding of what made the original film work. The story is basically the same, despite early talk that it would adapt the Oldboy manga rather than the film (only Park's film appears in the credits). Josh Brolin plays a feckless, heavy-drinking advertising executive called Joe Doucett (a nod to the original film's Oh Dae-su?) who is introduced to us in 1993, blowing a major business opportunity and failing to attend his daughter's third birthday party, much to his ex-wife's chagrin. After a boozy night, Joe awakens in an anonymous motel room with no means of escape, and this is where he will spend the next twenty years, at the whim of some vengeful foe, learning from his TV that he is the prime suspect in his ex-wife's murder.

Joe's entrapment is by far the strongest part of the film. Shooting in grainy 16mm, Lee and cinematographer Sean Bobbitt accentuate the intensity and strangeness of his predicament, while Lee depicts the passing years through a montage of notable news stories. Brolin's committed and haunted performance impresses too, particularly his weary, resigned sense that he has probably done something to deserve his extraordinary punishment – when he compiles a list of enemies, it turns out to be a very long one indeed. The film only starts to falter when Joe is suddenly released, twenty years later, finding himself in a field with a phone and a wallet full of cash. This is where the machinations of the plot begin to take over, and the film gets progressively less interesting.

Pacing has never been Spike Lee's strongest attribute, and he is entirely unsuited to a movie that really needs to power through its plot points. This Oldboy is lumpy and uneven, and too much of the film's second half feels like a film being directed by a man due to a sense of professional obligation rather than any connection with the material. The frequent and bloody violence doesn't possess any impact, the humour is off and the characterisation is dismal. The relationship between Joe and Marie (Elizabeth Olsen) is required to carry a great deal of emotional weight, but her character is so perfunctory this element of the plot is rendered useless (to be honest, this is a bad movie for women generally), while Samuel L. Jackson's reunion with Lee consists of some loud outfits and little else.

Perhaps the most misguided decision the filmmakers have made is to make Joe antagonist a preening, camp weirdo played by comically overmatched Sharlto Copley. Again, a premise this silly needs to be sold to us with a genuine sense of malevolence, but Copley's performance only induces giggles and bafflement. Will anybody who reaches Oldboy's botched ending care about the plot's supposedly shocking resolution?

Why did Spike Lee make this film? His last mainstream effort – 2006's thoroughly enjoyable Inside Man, also his last film to get a UK cinema release – allowed the director to bring his own sensibility to the material, shaping it with a New Yorker's sense of perspective, humour and place, but Oldboy isn't even set in Lee's home state. It's a terrible mismatch of filmmaker and project, and it reaches cinemas half-baked, butchered and with no sense of why it has been made or who it is for. It's even the first of Lee's films to come with the credit "A Spike Lee Film" rather than "A Spike Lee Joint," a decision he apparently made after an unhappy post-production process in which his 140-minute version was cut down. He may as well have taken his name off it altogether, because it's hard to detect his fingerprints anywhere on this anonymous and unnecessary retread.

Sunday, December 01, 2013

Abel Gance on Napoleon


Abel Gance's address to his cast and crew as production began on Napoleon: June 24th, 1924.

"This is a film which must – and let no one underestimate the profundity of what I'm saying – a film which must allow us to enter the Temple of Art through the giant gates of History. An inexpressible anguish grips me at the thought that my will and my vital gift are as nothing if you do not bring me your unremitting devotion.

Thanks to you, we are about to relive the French Revolution and Empire...a unique task. In you, we must find the passion, the folly, the power, the expertise and the self-denial of the soldiers of Year Two. Personal initiative will be all. I want to feel, as I watch you, a swelling force sweeping away your last rational defences so that I can no longer tell the differences between your hearts and your red caps!

Fast, foolish, furious, gigantic, raucous, Homeric, punctuated by organ-pauses which will make the dreadful silences resound all the more – that is what will be dragged out of you by the runaway horse of the Revolution.

And then there will be one man who looks it in the face, who understands it, who wants to use it for the good of France and who, in a flash, leaps onto his back, seizes it by the reins and slowly masters it, turning it into the most miraculous instrument of glory...

It is up to you, then, to recreate the immortal figures of the Revolution and its death-rattles, the Empire and its giant shadows, the Great Army and its rays of glory.

The world's screens await you, my friends. From all of you, whatever your role or rank, leading actors, supporting actors, cameramen, scenery artists, electricians, props, everyone, and especially you, the unsung extras who have to rediscover the spirit of your ancestors to find in your hearts the unity and fearlessness which was France between 1792 and 1815. I ask, no, I demand, that you abandon petty, personal considerations and give me your total devotion. Only in this way will you serve and revere the already illustrious cause of the first art-form of the future, through the most formidable lesson in history."