Tuesday, February 17, 2026
Frederick Wiseman Obituary
Wednesday, January 21, 2026
Saipan Review
Tuesday, January 06, 2026
Essay on Bernardo Bertolucci's Novecento
Written for the now-discontinued Eureka blu-ray edition in 2016.
In August 1974, Gideon Bachmann arrived in Italy to report on the production of Bernardo Bertolucci's Novecento for Sight & Sound. He had planned to spend one day on the set, but ended up staying for a whole week, with a diary of his experiences being published in the magazine a few months later. After a couple of days spent watching Bertolucci at work, taking note of the impressive scale (and spiralling cost) of everything, and growing frustrated at his failure to secure an interview with the director, he wrote, “What is it that makes film directors so sure of their value? Whence this presumption of being involved in an activity that must take precedence over other human obligations? Haven't we perhaps allowed them too much mythology, too much adoration?”
Cut to three years later. The fruits of Bertolucci's labours were finally presented to the paying American public in November 1977, but only after a long, acrimonious and very public battle between the director and his producer Alberto Grimaldi. The 315-minute version of Novecento shown at the 1976 Cannes Film Festival was whittled down to a relatively skimpy 195 minutes by Grimaldi, conscious of his contractual obligations to Paramount. Grimaldi had banned Bertolucci from the editing room, prompting the director to take legal action to protect his vision. “That isn't my film; that's a trailer, a travesty,” Bertolucci exclaimed in the press when asked about the new cut commissioned by his producer. “My friend is surrounded by sycophants who tell him he is God,” Grimaldi responded. “It started with Tango.”
The film made by a director after enjoying their first enormous success is a test. A few years before Michael Cimino went off the deep end and killed a studio with Heaven's Gate, Novecento was viewed as the prime example of a wunderkind being given his freedom and running for the hills with it. Last Tango in Paris was not only an astonishing critical and commercial hit in 1972, but a film that was instantly seen as a cinematic landmark, a breakthrough in adult artistic filmmaking. Following the more modest but still widely admired The Conformist and The Spider's Stratagem in the previous years, this was the kind of achievement that has other filmmakers heaping praise on the director (“How dare I make another film?” Robert Altman said, “My personal and artistic life will never be the same.”), has every actor lining up to work with him, and has studios throwing money in his direction in the hope of reaping the same artistic and financial rewards. Where does a young director go in that situation? Bertolucci decided to go big. Although his film is titled 1900 in many countries, a more accurate translation of Novecento is Twentieth Century, which immediately gives you a sense of the scale of his ambition.
Novecento was briefly mooted as a six-part series for Italian television, although what small screen in the mid-1970s could have contained the scope of Bertolucci’s images? This is self-consciously an epic work, large in every sense, and it’s no coincidence that Bertolucci begins his tale on January 27th 1901, with the announcement of the death of Giuseppe Verdi. The director is taking his lead from Verdi and telling his story in an operatic register, demanding grand, emotive performances from his actors (compare the dignified restraint Burt Lancaster exhibited in Visconti’s The Leopard to his work here), and instead of finding a consistent rhythm or narrative flow throughout the film, he focuses on staging loosely connected individual sequences that each build to a crescendo and aim to enrapture the viewer with their swelling melodramatic fervour. No wonder Pauline Kael spent much of her famous New Yorker review marvelling in equal parts at Bertolucci’s brilliance and foolhardiness, before summing up the film’s appeal by stating that “Next to it, all the other new movies are like something you hold up at the end of a toothpick.”
But despite the gigantic size of Novecento, Bertolucci’s flirtation with the idea of presenting it on television is telling. He wanted his socialist epic to be a film that spoke directly to the masses, a film that bypassed intellectual analysis and worked on a level of pure emotion, through arresting images and rousing rhetoric, culminating in a climactic speech being delivered directly into the camera. The film can be blunt and even crude in its approach, with Bertolucci taking a broad strokes approach to his storytelling, and the people we see in the film are less characters than symbols. His two protagonists Alfredo Berlinghieri (Robert De Niro) and Olmo Dalcò (Gérard Depardieu) are born into different classes on the same day in 1901. Alfredo is the scion of a bourgeois landowning family while Olmo is the bastard son of a peasant, and as the film charts their fluctuating fortunes and enduring, if complicated, friendship over the subsequent half-century, it becomes clear that the weight of history rests heavily on their shoulders. Through these two characters – plus a third, Attila, who we meet a little later – Bertolucci’s microcosmic film aims to show us the changing face of Italian politics, industry and class across five decades. Novecento pits the proletariat against the bourgeoisie and the communists against the fascists in a struggle for the country’s soul, and there is no doubt whose side the director is on.
Giuseppe Pellizza da Volpedo’s 1901 painting The Fourth Estate, which is shown under the opening credits, sets the visual tone, with Bertolucci and Vittorio Storario shooting the communists and the peasant masses as heroic figures throughout Novecento. They are noble, dignified, the salt of the earth; they work, eat, sing and dance together; they are a community. When faced with superior force during the workers’ strike of 1908, they band together and lay down in the road against the armed soldiers on horseback. When four men are killed in a building burned by fascists, they carry the charred bodies through the streets in protest, unafraid of reprisals. When women working in the fields take up pitchforks against the fleeing fascists on Liberation Day in 1945, they sing, “Even though we are women, we are not afraid,” a song that became popular again among left-wing Italian women during the strikes and demonstrations of the 1970s – Bertolucci linking then and now.
Compare this with the way Bertolucci shoots the fascists. It’s hard to think of many more despicable characters in the history of cinema than Attila Mellanchini. Played with leering, eye-popping intensity by Donald Sutherland and egged on by his Lady Macbeth-like wife (Laura Betti), he’s a grotesque embodiment of fascist ideology; a sadist and pervert who gleefully attacks children, animals and old women and is responsible for the most violent and upsetting moments in the film. Attila is the only fascist who really exists as a character in Novecento and therefore he acts as a representative for the entire order. On the few occasions when Attila does get his comeuppance – his humiliation escalating from straw to horse shit to pitchforks – it’s always the collective that rounds on him, but Attila is not in fact acting alone, he has a whole support network behind him, and you could even argue that, despite his cartoonish villainy, he is not Novecento’s true villain.
A key scene in Novecento takes place inside a church, where the landowners meet to discuss the growing unrest among the peasants. They agree to employ a private army of Blackshirts to maintain control, and thus, the fascist movement in Italy is born, with the links between the church, the bourgeoisie and the fascists being explicitly made. When his father dies, Alfredo becomes the padrone, inheriting the increasingly violent Attila along with the land, but he can do nothing to curb his fascist attack dog. Right from the start of Novecento, when both Alfredo and Olmo are boys, Bertolucci keeps finding ways to show us Alfredo’s inferiority in contrast to his lower-class friend. From comparing their penises (Alfredo’s foreskin is too tight) to daring to lie on the tracks as a train passes overhead (Alfredo flees at the last minute), to the fact that Olmo leaves to fight in the war, returning as a man, while Alfredo dresses as a soldier but stays at home, having been kept out of harm’s way by his rich father. Alfredo is fundamentally weak, and it is this weakness that allows fascism to flourish on his watch.
On a number of occasions he is encouraged to take action against Attila and stand up for Olmo and the peasants, often by his wife Ada (Dominique Sanda, whom Angela Dalle-Vacche suggested only exists in the film to deflect attention from the homoerotic tension between Alfredo and Olmo), but all Alfredo can do is look away and withdraw. Even when Olmo is taking a vicious beating from the fascists, Alfredo hesitates, only stepping in when the danger has passed. When he finally dismisses Attila towards the end of the film, Alfredo knocks on the peasants' doors and proclaims his action as if expecting applause, but it is too little, too late. Alfredo is not a fascist, but as he is told throughout the film, he is something even worse; a landowner who pays lip service to the needs of those in his care but who ensures his own protection above all else. He is an enabler.
Bertolucci has spoken of Novecento as being a film partially born from a sense of guilt, the guilt of being a member of the Italian Communist party but hailing from bourgeois origins. Thus, for all of its sprawling and outsized ambitions, the character of Alfredo makes this a deeply personal epic for the director, and reminds us of an era when such films were possible. Even in the mid-1970s, however, it's hard to believe that a major American studio could invest millions of dollars in a five-hour Italian epic replete with shocking violence and full-frontal nudity, not to mention the explicit celebration of communist values that occurs at the end of the film. Novecento's finale led to accusations of political naïveté on the part of the filmmaker, with the fascists being run off and the peasants putting Alfredo on trial, but Bertolucci insisted this was less naïveté than hope. “In my film the trial of the landowners seems to be taking place in 1945, but in reality it is situated in the future. It is a dream,” he told Le cinéma italien in 1978. “This entire sequence is an anticipation; it is a dream of something yet to be”; but the utopian vision of the sequence is complicated in the film's closing moments.
Olmo steps in to save Alfredo from execution, insisting that the padrone, the cause of their ills, is now dead, and Alfredo Berlinghieri should be allowed to walk away as a living testament to the padrone's demise; the villagers celebrate with songs and the triumphant waving of red flags, cheering as if the country is now theirs, but this celebratory mood is short-lived. The provisional government arrives to confiscate their guns, and as Alfredo is rescued by Olmo, he tells his old friend with a wry smile, “The padrone is still alive,” before the two begin tussling once more in a futile, comical manner. The country does not yet belong to the people, there will always be a padrone, and the struggle continues.
Wednesday, December 31, 2025
The Best Films of 2025
24– Sirāt (Óliver Laxe)If I was ranking these films purely in terms of the experience I had watching them, then Sirāt would be sitting comfortably in the top five. This is a movie that needs to be seen on the big screen, not just for the booming sound mix, but for the experience of watching it with a packed audience, all of whom gasped in unison at a couple of significant dramatic developments. After I had stepped away from the intensity of the cinema and began to contemplate Sirāt in the cold light of day, I felt less certain about it. Laxe does an incredible job of creating and sustaining a sense of tension, and he toys with our emotional state with sadistic glee, but does it ultimately amount to anything more than a few cheap tricks? I still harbour the suspicion that this is a skilled but hollow piece of showmanship, but I can’t deny that it was an exhilarating time at the movies and something I would unhesitatingly recommend to anyone, and that’s not something to be sniffed at.
Sunday, December 28, 2025
My Cinema Discoveries of 2025
35 – The Naked Truth (Mario Zampi, 1957) – BFI Southbank, 35mmThe Naked Truth stars Dennis Price as a muckraking journalist who digs up dirt to blackmail public figures, so four of his victims concoct plots to murder him. This is a solid comic premise that throws up a couple of amusing set-pieces, particularly as the various independent plotters have a habit of getting in each other’s way; I especially enjoyed watching Peggy Mount and Joan Sims attempt to dispose of a corpse, only to discover that they had drugged the wrong person. Terry-Thomas is very funny as the luckless Lord Mayley, who keeps inadvertently becoming the victim of others’ plans, while Peter Sellers takes the opportunity to try on a variety of accents and disguises, at one point pretending to be an Irishman to buy explosives in a pub.
34 – El Cid (Anthony Mann, 1962) – BFI Southbank, 35mmI’d seen chunks of El Cid when I was a child and it was on TV for what seemed to be the whole of Sunday afternoon, but I had never been able to sit through it. In truth, I got a little fidgety during this screening, although the big screen is certainly the only way to appreciate the awesome scale of this film. Charlton Heston is not exactly the most convincing choice to portray the 11th century Spanish hero, and I found the narrative a little tiresome to follow, with its murky character motivations and longwinded conversations. What I did respond to was Mann’s direction. He stages some magnificent scenes utilising the full resources of this gargantuan production and he creates a number of arresting frames, in one case using a split-diopter to striking effect. Mann also fully understand the power a Sophia Loren close-up can bring to a picture. El Cid can be a bit of a slog but it does have a very strong ending.
32 – The Lost Man (Robert Alan Aurthur, 1969) – BFI Southbank, 35mmBefore watching The Lost Man, I didn’t know that this was a loose adaptation of Odd Man Out, but the connection started to become clear once Sidney Poitier had been wounded in a heist and had to seek refuge from the police. This is an interesting role for Poitier, playing an impassive militant crook who has planned this robbery for the purpose of funnelling money towards the black revolutionary movement, he strikes a much tougher and more complex figure than he had been in most of his films to date. The Lost Man isn’t directed with enough flair or tension to grip all the way to the finish line, but it does have its virtues. The heist itself is very well staged, and the film possesses a strong sense of location, with the score from Quincy Jones adding a good deal of atmosphere.
31 – The Comedians (Peter Glenville, 1967) – BFI Southbank, 35mmAlthough it has a poor critical reputation, I enjoyed this Graham Greene adaptation, which places a series of interpersonal conflicts against the backdrop of Papa Doc’s brutal regime in Haiti. The film does a decent job of showing the corruption and atrocities that occurred under that regime in a frank manner, and it’s a pleasure to watch this cast of screen legends at work. Roscoe Lee Browne, Paul Ford, Lillian Gish, James Earl Jones and Peter Ustinov are all excellent in their supporting roles, and while the Burton and Taylor scenes don’t create much of a spark, the scenes that Burton shares with Alec Guinness are superb. In particular, there’s one quiet conversation they share in a graveyard towards the end that’s magnificently acted. The Comedians could have perhaps done with a slightly more exciting director, but it’s a better film than its reputation suggests.
30 – The Tango Lesson (Sally Potter, 1997) – BFI Southbank, 35mmIn this film, the two leads are played by first-time actors playing versions of themselves. Director Sally Potter is the filmmaker developing a new project in Paris while her London home is being renovated. There, she meets dancer Pablo Verón, with whom she starts taking tango lessons and develops a romantic relationship. In truth, the performances given by these inexperienced actors are the film’s weakest element, and the drama surrounding their romance unfolds in a series of scenes that are often flat and cheesy. However, Potter makes the most of the dance numbers, staging a number of beautiful sequences with the help of the great Robby Müller. He shoots most of the movie in lustrous black-and-white, which is often spellbinding, particularly in these dance on the banks of the Seine with the lights of the city in the background, and he also gives the film an occasional jolt of vibrant colour with the imagined scenes from Potter’s unmade film. A fun detail from the end credits: Müller's apprentice on this film was a young man named Hoyte van Hoytema.
29 – The Squeeze (Michael Apted, 1977) – Cinema Museum, 35mmIf I was casting the lead detective role in a 1970s British film, Stacy Keach would not have been the first name on my list of possibilities, but he is surprisingly effective as the shambling, drunken cop Jim Nabors, who needs to sober up quickly when his ex-wife is abducted and held for ransom. ‘Surprisingly effective’ is a term we could use for Freddie Starr too, an unexpected choice as Keach’s loyal buddy who provides a very good supporting performance. The Squeeze is an exceptionally seedy and bleak affair, immersing us in a series of grubby hideouts and gloomy pubs, although some its street scenes have a vivid sense of life, especially when shooting around Notting Hill. The film’s ugliest scene forces Carol White to perform a horribly protracted striptease for her captors, but the film also gives us far more Stacy Keach's naked body than you may be expecting.
27 – The Decks Ran Red (Andrew L. Stone, 1958) – BFI Southbank, 35mmA black-and-white film, although the title appears in a dripping red font, suggesting much bloodshed ahead. Inspired by a real 1905 incident, The Decks Ran Red is set on a ramshackle freighter where a couple of sailors (Broderick Crawford and Stuart Whitman) concoct a plot to scuttle the engines and murder everyone on board before submitting an insurance claim of a million dollars on the stricken ship. Having just been flown in to replace the previous captain, who died in mysterious circumstances, James Mason stands in their way, and the stage is set for a very involving thriller. Stone uses the layout of the ship intelligently to ramp up the cat-and-mouse tension – in some ways, this feels like a forerunner of Die Hard or Under Siege – but what’s most memorable about The Decks Ran Red is the complete absence of music. Instead we just get the sound of the ship and the sea as backdrop to the action, and it’s extremely effective.
24 – The Frontier Experience / The Boy Who Liked Deer (Barbara Loden, 1975) – BFI Southbank, Digital/16mmFor many years, Barbara Loden has been discussed as the director of a single film, 1970’s terrific Wanda, but that’s not the whole story. These two shorts were made as educational films for the Learning Corporation of America, and they are both made with great care and intelligence. Written by Joan Micklin Silver, The Frontier Experience tells the story of a pioneer family living through their first year in Kansas in 1869, with Loden taking the lead role as the mother who has to keep the family together during a harsh winter. Loden’s direction is simple but potent, expressing the loneliness and desolation of this family’s surroundings. Her other short The Boy Who Liked Deer packs a real punch. It’s the story of a teenage tearaway who thinks nothing of the consequences of his behaviour, until he sees the impact that his vandalism has on both his teacher and his beloved deer. It’s a smartly made and very moving piece of work.
21 – A Place to Go (Basil Dearden, 1963) – BFI Southbank, 35mmI spent part of this year thinking about the work of Basil Dearden as I contributed an essay on him to the book Great Expectations: British Postwar Cinema 1945-1963. One film that fell outside the purview of that piece was A Place to Go, but it’s another reminder of the vital perspective that this still-underrated director always brought to his films. A Place to Go is a drama about a family living in East London in the early 60s, and the narrative is concerned with young wide boy Mike Sarne falling in with a criminal element, but Dearden’s real interest clearly lies in the social changes that were occurring in this area at the time. This was the era of slum clearances, with families being forced out of the dilapidated homes they had lived in for years and being moved into brand-new high-rise flats, and Dearden captures the poignancy of this progress, particularly through a tender performance from Doris Hare as the mother crestfallen to leave her home of thirty years. A Place to Go was shot on location, and it’s an invaluable snapshot of how the streets I'm so familiar with once looked.
19 – Park Lanes (Kevin Jerome Everson, 2015) – Barbican, DigitalOne Sunday this past February I spent the day watching people work. Park Lanes is a documentary filmed in a Virginia factory where bowling lanes are constructed and assembled, and it has been made to reflect the structure of a working day. The film runs for eight hours, beginning with workers arriving at the factory, observing their various tasks, watching them take their lunch break, and then back to work before they head home at the end of the day. Why would anyone watch this, you ask? Well, it’s pretty absorbing viewing. Once I got into the film’s rhythms, I found it to be transfixing, and aside from a few minutes when I nipped out to grab another coffee and use the toilet, I was happy to sit there for the whole duration. Park Lanes allows us to see every step that goes into the making of a bowling lane, and you come away with a real respect for the people who do this intricate work every day.
18 – Landscape in the Mist (Theo Angelopoulos, 1988) – ICA, DigitalAfter waiting years for the opportunity to see the work of Theo Angelopoulos on the big screen, I frustratingly couldn’t make it to as many of the ICA’s retrospective screenings as I wanted to, and I struggled to connect with some of the films I did see. The Travelling Players is brilliantly crafted, although its dense interweaving of Greek history left me feeling confounded for much of it. Landscape in the Mist is the one that really clicked with me. The story is simple, following two children as they travel to Germany to seek the father they have never met, encountering both kindness and cruelty from adults along the way. As ever, Angelopoulos composes magnificent long takes, but there’s an emotional reach to this film that I didn’t get from many of his others, particularly in the unforgettable ending.
17 – Improper Conduct (Néstor Almendros and Orlando Jiménez Leal, 1984) – ICA, 16mmA curious thing happened when I bought my ticket for a film called Improper Conduct at the ICA. The film advertised was a 1994 drama about sexual harassment in the workplace, but when the screening started it quickly transpired that we were instead watching a documentary about Fidel Castro’s persecution of intellectuals, dissidents and homosexuals. The film consists of interviews with those who fled Castro’s regime and are now residing in the US or Europe, and their testimonies of the repression, fear and torture that they experienced in Cuba carry a powerful emotional charge. It’s an exceptional and completely enthralling documentary, and it's was a particularly revelatory discovery considering I had no idea of this film’s existence before the screening started.
16 – The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (Vincente Minnelli, 1962) – BFI Southbank, 35mmFor the character of a Latino ladies’ man – a role once played by Rudolf Valentino – Vincente Minnelli wanted Alain Delon, which makes sense. MGM wanted Glenn Ford, which makes much less sense. The miscasting of the the stolid 46 year-old Ford as an avowedly neutral playboy who faces a crisis of conscience as war rages around him is just one of the missteps that this drama makes. Ford stars alongside Paul Henreid and Ingrid Thulin (looking unhappy, and dubbed by Angela Lansbury), but the one actor who really makes an impression is Lee J. Cobb, who rants and raves forebodingly and introduces the concept of the four horsemen before promptly dying in the prologue. Stuck with a story and a leading man he didn’t care for, the director said he simply focused on making the film as visually stunning as possible, and every scene is shot with astonishing flair and vibrancy, with Minnelli's masterful blocking of crowd scenes in particular standing out. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse was a notorious critical and commercial flop in 1962, but it was a sensational experience to discover it on this gorgeous 35mm print.
12 – On Approval (Clive Brook, 1944) – BFI Southbank, 35mmThis was the only film ever directed by the actor Clive Brook. After watching On Approval – which Lindsay Anderson called “The funniest British comedy ever made” – his failure to progress in this field feels like a terrible loss. It’s a battle of the sexes comedy with two mismatched couples forced to spend a week together in Scotland, and the actors take great pleasure in delivering the script’s rapid-fire bitchy dialogue: "You needn't try to lock your door, Maria. Only the rain will want to come in." The material is already very funny, but what really elevates the film above the standard romantic comedy fare is Brook’s inventive filmmaking. He sets the tone at the start of the picture with a ridiculous newsreel prologue, and there is so much fun to be had in his framing, pacing and visual gags. Quite why Brook never again stepped behind the camera, or even acted in movies again for almost two decades, is beyond me.
10 – Strongroom (Vernon Sewell, 1962) – BFI Southbank, 35mmThis low-budget British drama begins with a simple heist plotted for a Saturday morning, just before a bank closes its doors ahead of the bank holiday weekend. Of course, it all goes awry, but the way things go cataclysmically wrong is handled perfectly by director Sewell. He creates a situation where the criminals are desperate to get back into the bank but are prevented from doing so, and where a couple of the bank’s employees are trapped in the vault, trying to maintain their rapidly diminishing air supply, and over the course of eighty taut minutes he squeezes maximum tension out of this scenario. There are terrific character turns all the way down the cast, but Colin Gordon and Ann Lynn are particularly good as the bank manager and his secretary, who have always had a cold, formal relationship, but find a different connection in these grave circumstances. It’s a riveting thriller, with a gut-punch of an ending.
8 – Hurlevent (Jacques Rivette, 1985) – ICA, 35mmJacques Rivette’s work has seen a notable increase in visibility in recent years thanks to a number of restorations – I now have blu-rays of the long unavailable Out 1 and L'Amour fou sitting on my shelf, which is something I scarcely could have imagined just over a decade ago. One of the most obscure works still in need of rediscovery is Hurlevent. For this screening the ICA imported the only 35mm print they could find, and presented it with live subtitles. It’s a little surprising that this film is so little-known, because it’s certainly one of his shorter and most accessible films, and in fact it is an adaptation of Wuthering Heights. Rivette focuses on the first half of the book and takes a stripped down approach to the aesthetic style, but he has such a keen sense of the shifting dynamics between these characters, and his incorporation of some brilliantly crafted dream sequences is incredibly powerful. One hopes this film receives the same treatment as the rest of Rivette’s oeuvre soon. It deserves to be much more widely seen and acclaimed.
5 – Ludwig (Luchino Visconti, 1973) – BFI Southbank, 35mmThe BFI’s Luchino Visconti retrospective was named Decadence and Decay, and that’s an apt way to sum up this epic film. Ludwig is a portrait of Ludwig II of Bavaria, who is better known by the sobriquet The Mad King. In Visconti’s depiction, he doesn’t come across as entirely mad, at least not initially, just a man who has been thrust into a role he is ill-equipped for and uninterested in. Ludwig would rather build castles and fund his favourite artists (notably Richard Wagner) than deal with affairs of state. Seen in its full 237-minute version on a lush 35mm print, Ludwig is slow and stately, but I found it entirely absorbing and occasionally surprisingly funny – there’s a hilarious segment where Ludwig essentially holds his favourite actor hostage, forcing the exhausted thespian to perform classic roles on demand, and I love the scene where Romy Schneider searches for Ludwig in his many castles and can only cackle at the ridiculous opulence of it all. As the king, Helmut Berger has a suitably detached and haunted quality, growing increasingly wild-eyed and paranoid, bearing his blackened teeth, in the film's second half as the cabinet plots his removal. As ever with Visconti, Ludwig is overwhelming in its aesthetic splendour and indulgence.
4 – City of Pirates (Raúl Ruiz, 1983) – ICA, 35mmRaúl Ruiz reportedly embarked upon City of Pirates after feeling that his previous film The Three Crowns of the Sailor had been too commercial. No chance of any such description being applied to this film. Ruiz wrote the script using a technique of automatic writing immediately after he had woken up, and the film feels like something that has sprung up unfiltered from the subconscious. There is a narrative of sorts running throughout the picture, in which Melvil Poupaud makes his screen debut as a 10 year-old who claims to have murdered his own family and ends up proposing to Anne Alvaro, but the film unfolds with a languid dream logic. Ruiz incorporates so many different cinematic techniques to give every scenes a startling look, and seen on a beautiful 35mm print, it was easy to succumb to the strange and overwhelming atmosphere of curiosity and dread that the film conjures up. I can't recall the last time I saw a single film that made me gasp so frequently at the brilliance and imagination of its compositions.
3 – Doomed Love (Manoel de Oliveira, 1978) – ICA, 35mmDoomed Love could be seen as a ‘Late Style’ film, given the fact that director Manoel de Oliveira was around 70 years old when he made it, but the fact that he went on making films for another 34 years somewhat confuses that definition. There is a stately quality to this film, which achieves, better than almost any other film I can think of, the effect of reading an epic 19th century novel. Inspired by events that occurred in his own family’s history, Camilo Castelo Branco’s 1862 novel Amor de Perdição tells the story of two young lovers, whose passion for each other is thwarted by their feuding families. De Oliveira leans heavily on the use of a narrator to relay some of these facts to the audience, but his careful blocking and beautifully lit compositions draw the viewer in. The version we saw was the 262-minute theatrical presentation rather than the (heavily criticised at the time) 287-minute television version, and I was completely under its spell for the entire running time, right up to the heart-stopping final moments.
2 – Chelsea Girls (Andy Warhol and Paul Morrissey, 1966) – BFI Southbank, 16mmA unique cinema experience for a one-of-a-kind film. Chelsea Girls consists of twelve reels capturing Factory regulars as they sit around and talk, but the reels are projected side-by-side, with the sound muted on one reel at a time. In his dismissive review, Roger Ebert wrote, "Like so many other elements of Andy Warhol’s world, it has little intrinsic worth. You must have the faith before you go into the theater; you must be, as the used car dealers say, 'pre-sold'." But as someone who has been bored by some of Warhol’s experiments in the past, I found this surprisingly fascinating viewing. It’s a testament to the natural charisma of many of the participants that they manage to captivate for almost three and a half hours, even when they are doing next to nothing. These vignettes are often mundane but occasionally quite funny and frequently compelling, with the unpredictable Ondine – the self-styled “Pope of Greenwich Village” – introducing a genuine sense of tension into his climactic encounter with Ingrid Superstar.
.jpeg)




.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)







































